Parents of Unvaccinated Children Sue Rockland County - Judge Rules in Their Favor and Ends the BanTwo lawsuits were filed this week by parents of unvaccinated children in Rockland County, where unvaccinated children had been banned from public places, including schools and daycare centers. Earlier today (Friday, April 5th), Supreme Court Judge Rolf Thorsen sided with the parents and issued a temporary injunction against County Supervisor Ed Day's emergency order, effectively ending the ban. Robert Brum of the Rockland/Westchester Journal News reported: "A judge today halted Rockland County Executive Ed Day's emergency declaration barring children who are unvaccinated against measles from schools, places of worship and other public areas. Acting state Supreme Court Judge Rolf Thorsen's injunction stated that the 166 cases cited by the county since the measles outbreak began last October did not rise to the level of an epidemic or constitute a disaster. Day's reliance on executive law in issuing the emergency declaration "may have been misplaced," the decision stated. Thorsen agreed with the families who sued the county when they said their children would continue to miss school, and the parents would continue to incur monetary expenses as a result of the order. The families asserted that the children posed no threat to other children at a school where there had been no reported cases of the measles."
Parents of Unvaccinated Children Sue Rockland County - Judge Rules in Their Favor and Ends the Ban
The absolute failing with people trying to use the legal system is to try once, either fail or succeed, but then to not press on with overwhelming force until the goal is reached. I can only presume how this went: They sued the 'county'. This is a fallacy within the system because 'the county' is not a living being. Living beings cause harm to other living beings, fictitious entities do not. EVERYONE involved from govern mente to public health should have been named as co-conspirators in a CRIMINAL ACTION, but I suspect this was a civil proceeding. Another abysmal failure. I say failure because it was a TEMPORARY injunction. That was just a ploy to delay the declaration of 'emergency' which is part of War Powers. This is indeed a war because EVERYONE knows that vaccines are biological weapons. Can't remember and don't care who the highly placed official was who said that the only safe vaccine is the one not given. The arguments cited were religious, work, and lack of threat. The ONLY issue should have been that vaccines are weapons: evidence could have been given on the actual Patient Zero of the measles outbreak and the genetic strain present coming from the vaccine and the total count of previously vaccinated kids that got the measles to satisfy the Daubert standard in scientific evidence. 100% vaccination should have been cited as a criminal act by all of the NAMED since even the govern mente claims that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe. Arguing ONLY about the safety and efficacy of ONE vaccine such as the MMR is another one of their traps. ALL VACCINES ARE BAD ALL THE TIME. This situation needs to be hammered as a full-frontal assault until all of the players are imprisoned for fraud and attempted murder; because this same situation will arise again in about three months when a suitable excuse for 'emergency' is found and then the Easter Bunny and Passover aren't going to matter for the good of the many over the good of the dead.