• Dr. Andrew Wakefield: Fraud or Scapegoat?

    I have undertaken this review of the case against Dr. Andrew Wakefield because the issues involved are far more consequential than the vilification of one doctor. The issues, as I see them, involve (a) collusion of public health officials to deceive the public by concealing scientific evidence that confirms empirical evidence of serious harm linked to vaccines – in particular polyvalent vaccines; (b) the “willful blindness” by the medical community as it uncritically fell in line with a government dictated vaccination policy driven by corporate business interests. Public health officials and the medical profession have abrogated their professional, public, and human responsibility, by failing to honestly examine the iatrogenic harm caused by expansive, indiscriminate, and increasingly aggressive vaccination policies. On a human level, the documented evidence shows a callous disregard for the plight of thousands of children who suffer irreversible harm, as if they were unavoidable “collateral damage”. All of the documented evidence and testimonies submitted to the General Medical Council, upon which GMC issued its guilty verdicts against Dr. Wakefield and his two co-defendants in 2010, were subsequently forensically assessed by the UK High Court in March 2012, in the appeal of Professor John Walker-Smith, the senior clinician and senior author of the Lancet case series. The High Court determined that the verdicts of professional misconduct and ethics violations were unsupported by the evidence. Indeed, the adjudicated evidence refutes the case against Dr. Wakefield; the documents and testimonies demonstrate that there is no evidence whatsoever, to support the charges of professional misconduct, much less the accusation of fraud. The accusation of fraud was hurled by the Editor-in-Chief of the BMJ, a medical journal whose corporate ownership is intertwined with the vaccine manufacturing Behemoths, Merck – with whom BMJ signed a partnership agreement in 2008 – and GlaxoSmithKline which provides additional financial support to BMJ. Among their numerous vaccine products, Merck and GSK manufacture the MMR vaccine.

    Read full story...

  • Dr. Andrew Wakefield: Fraud or Scapegoat?

    Dr. Eggersten is a family doctor who could not understand why some of his patient's refused vaccines and whose views were diametrically opposed to what he had always believed from the CDC. Specifically, another doctor had told him that Dr. Andrew Wakefield is a criminal. When he told this to one if his patients, she said, "you are wrong, Dr. Wakefield is a hero".

    Dr. Eggersten decided to do what very few doctors do....he researched for himself. His findings are honest and thorough. He made this short one hour video to help educate other physicians. This is real research and real science.

    I recommend everyone watch this, but especially those of you who are on the fence or have a spouse who questions your decision to not vaccinate your children. Unless your pediatrician has done this type of research, all they know is the party line.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LB-3xkeDAE

  • Dr. Andrew Wakefield: Fraud or Scapegoat?

    DR. WAKEFIELD EXONERATED BY THE LANCET

    http://www.truthlibrary.info/articles/health/another-vaxxed-bombshell-the-lancet-acknowledges-dr-andrew-wakefield-is-exonerated/

  • Dr. Andrew Wakefield: Fraud or Scapegoat?

    WAKEFIELD: WHAT THE VACCINE INDUSTRY PR REPORTS LEFT OUT

    https://steemit.com/vaccines/@canadian-coconut/dr-andrew-wakefield-a-villain-or-a-hero-here-s-what-the-mainstream-media-has-left-out

  • Dr. Andrew Wakefield: Fraud or Scapegoat?

    Admin said:

    I have undertaken this review of the case against Dr. Andrew Wakefield because the issues involved are far more consequential than the vilification of one doctor. The issues, as I see them, involve (a) collusion of public health officials to deceive the public by concealing scientific evidence that confirms empirical evidence of serious harm linked to vaccines – in particular polyvalent vaccines; (b) the “willful blindness” by the medical community as it uncritically fell in line with a government dictated vaccination policy driven by corporate business interests. Public health officials and the medical profession have abrogated their professional, public, and human responsibility, by failing to honestly examine the iatrogenic harm caused by expansive, indiscriminate, and increasingly aggressive vaccination policies. On a human level, the documented evidence shows a callous disregard for the plight of thousands of children who suffer irreversible harm, as if they were unavoidable “collateral damage”. All of the documented evidence and testimonies submitted to the General Medical Council, upon which GMC issued its guilty verdicts against Dr. Wakefield and his two co-defendants in 2010, were subsequently forensically assessed by the UK High Court in March 2012, in the appeal of Professor John Walker-Smith, the senior clinician and senior author of the Lancet case series. The High Court determined that the verdicts of professional misconduct and ethics violations were unsupported by the evidence. Indeed, the adjudicated evidence refutes the case against Dr. Wakefield; the documents and testimonies demonstrate that there is no evidence whatsoever, to support the charges of professional misconduct, much less the accusation of fraud. The accusation of fraud was hurled by the Editor-in-Chief of the BMJ, a medical journal whose corporate ownership is intertwined with the vaccine manufacturing Behemoths, Merck – with whom BMJ signed a partnership agreement in 2008 – and GlaxoSmithKline which provides additional financial support to BMJ. Among their numerous vaccine products, Merck and GSK manufacture the MMR vaccine.

    He was made a scapegoat and this should be recognised as a black mark in the way our health service is run-vested interest I have a grandson damaged by the MMR vaccination 18yrs ago. In my eyes Dr Wakefield is a hero and shows up the doctors that deny damage by them

    Regards and thanks for all you are doing,

    Jacqui