• Study: Combining Childhood Vaccines at One Visit Is Not Safe

    Although health authorities including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) claim that childhood vaccines are safe and recommend combining multiple vaccines during one visit, a review of data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) shows a dose-dependent association between the number of vaccines administered simultaneously and the likelihood of hospitalization or death for an adverse reaction. Additionally, younger age at the time of the adverse reaction is associated with a higher risk of hospitalization or death. Our study showed that infants who receive several vaccines concurrently, as recommended by CDC, are significantly more likely to be hospitalized or die when compared with infants who receive fewer vaccines simultaneously. It also showed that reported adverse effects were more likely to lead to hospitalization or death in younger infants. These findings are so troubling that we expected major media outlets in America to sound an alarm, calling for an immediate reevaluation of current preventive health care practices. But 4 years after publication of our study, this has not happened. Could it be because, according to Robert Kennedy, Jr., about 70% of advertising revenue on network news comes from drug companies? In fact, the president of a network news division admitted that he would fire a host who brought on a guest that led to loss of a pharmaceutical account. That may be why the mainstream media won’t give equal time to stories about problems with vaccine safety. The safety of CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule was never affirmed in clinical studies. Vaccines are administered to millions of infants every year, yet health authorities have no scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines that infants are likely to receive. National vaccination campaigns must be supported by scientific evidence. No child should be subjected to a health policy that is not based on sound scientific principles and, in fact, has been shown to be potentially dangerous.

    Read full story...

  • Study: Combining Childhood Vaccines at One Visit Is Not Safe

    hank you for the great research and its findings presented in this article!

    I however take issue with some of the points made.

    "Administering six, seven, or eight vaccine doses to an infant during a single physician visit is certainly more convenient for parents, as opposed to making additional trips to the doctor’s office, and increases the likelihood that the infant will receive all the vaccines, but vaccine safety must remain the highest priority."

    For one thing, the term "vaccine safety" is an oxymoron (contradiction in terms) in that as chemical and biological agents vaccines are never safe and always carry an unpredictable risk of vaccine-induced reactions, illnesses, disorders, disabilities or death. Even the US Supreme Court has declared vaccines "unavoidably unsafe".

    Rather than say "... but vaccine safety must remain the highest priority." this should in my opinion say, "...but in view of the findings outlined in this article the entire vaccination schedule needs to be re-evaluated."

    Furthermore, "National vaccination campaigns must be supported by scientific evidence."

    This is really a rhetorical statement because obviously there is no scientific evidence whatsoever underpinning vaccination campaigns. To be truthful, one would have to amend this statement as follows:

    "Because national vaccination campaigns are not supported by scientific evidence, an immediate moratorium should be imposed on them until such scientific evidence is provided to and assessed by a truly independent body of people qualified to assess the situation."

    As far as I am concerned, this disastrous medical practice should have been abolished decades ago. In fact, humanity would have been spared the enormous vaccine-related suffering and countless vaccine-induced tragedies if instead of indulging himself, Edward Jenner's father had pulled out before the critical moment prior to Edward's conception in 1748..