• How Journalists are Censored from Covering Both Sides of the Vaccine Debate

    Investigative reporter Jennifer Margulis has asked Health Impact News to re-publish a book review she recently wrote, which was published by The Washington Independent Review of Books. She reports that it was among the top five most read reviews for October 2014 which the Washington Independent Review of Books publicized in a second article. Then the editor pulled the review off their website. Why? Citing a supposed "conflict of interest" that Margulis states was cleared by the editors prior to publication, Margulis states the real reason she believes it was censored was because: I “express outrage that newborn infants are routinely vaccinated for hep B” and I wonder why I was encouraged to vaccinate my daughter “against a disease she had no chance of catching.”

    Read full story...

  • How Journalists are Censored from Covering Both Sides of the Vaccine Debate

    I'm familiar with Biss's book and I think Margulis wrote a very accurate review of it. My own opinion is that Biss's book is an utter waste of time for any parent who wants to make a well-informed, wise choice re: vaccination.
  • How Journalists are Censored from Covering Both Sides of the Vaccine Debate

    We have these quarterly reports linked to here as well: http://vaccineimpact.com/vaccine-injuries-and-deaths-compensated-through-vaccine-court/
  • How Journalists are Censored from Covering Both Sides of the Vaccine Debate

    Vaccine Injuries and Death Payments, Vincent J. Matanoski Deputy Director, Torts Branch June 5, 2014. See it here: http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/dojpresentation.pdf
  • How Journalists are Censored from Covering Both Sides of the Vaccine Debate

    Now i can see the overall picture, great article.