• Will European HPV Vaccine Investigation Reveal the Truth?

    The SaneVax team believes the narrow scope of the current investigation regarding the safety profile of HPV vaccines being conducted by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), will leave parents and medical professionals without answers to questions which may help them solve the mystery surrounding new medical conditions being reported not only in Denmark, but around the globe, after the administration of HPV vaccines. Has the EMA put POTS and CRPS under an investigative microscope in order to blur the overall picture regarding the safety profile of HPV vaccines? Have those in charge never heard the expression, “you can’t see the forest for the trees?” Norwegian journalist, Per Egil Hegge, puts the entire issue into focus when he stated: A scientific environment, no matter the subject, where it is not allowed to ask questions, has thrown its future on the scrap heap and nailed its own death sentence on the wall. Apparently, open discussions on the topic of HPV vaccines are tabu. This is simply not acceptable. If open honest scientific investigations are not forthcoming, young people around the world will continue to have their futures thrown on the proverbial scrap heap. If serious investigations are not conducted, it may well be the public’s trust in national health authorities that is thrown on the trash heap.

    Read full story...

  • Will European HPV Vaccine Investigation Reveal the Truth?

    It is most appropriate that the SaneVax team has focused on the fact that there are many unanswered questions regarding the HPV vaccines. A list of questions is suggested for parents and anyone who administers the vaccines to ask the health authorities. There is a rapidly growing number of individuals across the world who are far better informed than ever before regarding potential vaccine dangers, and who are becoming increasingly aware of their rights to self determination of their bodies. Many study vaccines seriously from independent sources for years and they gain deeper knowledge than the average doctor – whose information is often strongly influenced by the industry. When medical consumers, parents and anyone who administers vaccines ask health authorities serious questions concerning vaccine safety it is surely reasonable to expect answers with these characteristics: – Answers which are based on complete transparency regarding interest conflicts with respect to health authorities including EMA, FDA, WHO etc. – Answers which are based on honesty regarding connections between vaccine manufacturers, politicians, doctors etc – Answers which are not dishonestly influenced by political strategies. – Answers which are not misleading concerning the definition of “safe”. (Health authorities and other vaccine promoters operate with entirely different definitions of the word “safe” regarding vaccines. The general public interprets “safe” as being almost free from risks, a definition which is worlds apart from that of vaccine promoters who present the term safe based on numbers which have been massaged by creative statisticians). – Answers which are honest and not misleading regarding the considerable difference between numbers of vaccines distributed and numbers administered. – Answers which are honest with respect to numbers of serious adverse reactions, knowing the fact that these are based on a voluntary system which is characterized by gross underreporting. – Answers which are reliable and unbiased, based on independent studies and documentation and which also include facts which may possibly be interpreted as unfavourable regarding vaccine safety and efficacy. – Answers which are not misleading. (One example is a statement such as “There have not been any deaths registered due to a specific vaccine” when it is well known that many accidents including motor vehicle accidents are a consequence of feeling unwell, fainting and/ or seizures, these being known adverse reactions to vaccines). – Answers which are not misleading, (for example that a specific adverse reaction has not been registered, when it is a fact that nobody has actually looked for the occurrence of this reaction). – Answers concerning safety statistics which are not tainted by biased clinical trials (regarding for example false placebos and unethical strategy concerning exclusion criteria). – Answers which do not include statements which are irrelevant to the questions, but which appear to be obligatory “mantras”, such as “Benefits outweigh potential risks” – when there is no evidence that this is the case. – Answers which do not imply that those who are suffering after vaccinations have psychiatric problems when this is not the case. – Answers which do not imply that the authorities know facts when this is not the case: (Here are some examples: Neither authorities nor doctors know if a vaccine will cause cancer because vaccines are not tested for carcinogenicity. Nor do they know about genotoxicity as vaccines are not tested for this. Nor do they normally have knowledge concerning infertility or congenital anomalies as there is seldom testing performed regarding these issues. Nor do they have satisfactory knowledge of long term adverse reactions which include autoimmune conditions (80 ) as these, according to Prof Schoenfeld, world leading expert in autoimmunity may occur up to eight years after vaccination. Nor do they know the complete list of ingredients as this includes secret substances, governed by trade secret agreements. Nor do they normally have substantial knowledge of accumulation effect and toxic burden for individuals regarding administration of many vaccines, nor about potential interactions and synergistic toxicity regarding concomitantly administered vaccines). Last but not least, – Answers which do not give the impression of arrogance, lack of respect and mistrust regarding parents and their children when there is suffering after vaccinations. – Answers which are presented respectfully, with honesty and in true modesty, from health authorities whose function is to be of service for the well being of the community. (Sandy Lunoe)
  • Will European HPV Vaccine Investigation Reveal the Truth?

    In the letter of mr. Henrik Jensen: "WE WILL EXPECT to see a significant decrease in the numbers in the years to come – and combining the screening and vaccination programs we will be able to almost eradicate cervical cancer." How vague does he want to be? Or how truthful? Aaah, he wants apologies... To himself, NOT from him to all the young women that have been and will be damaged by the first-ever recombinant, gene wrecking HPV vaccins. I am sorry to say that all the doubts and fears that I presented in my book on the HPV vaccines (in Dutch, 2009) have become gruesome reality. Today I even dare to say out loud that the HPV vaccines are a sterilization agenda...