AdminM said:

I cannot understand why we are in a police state atmosphere right now. Over 99% of those that contract COVID-19 will recover from it. Folks, I am not minimizing this illness. COVID-19 is something to take seriously. It is highly contagious and spreads quickly. Yes, it causes respiratory failure and death in those most susceptible: the elderly and those with chronic health conditions including diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, and lung disorders. We may not even have enough respirators for those who have a serious case. However, there is another side to this story that is not being told. Did you know that COVID-19 is much less deadly than the common flu?

Thank you for this. There is an incredible amount of misinformation due in large part to the internet, which makes it possible for countless opinions to proliferate. For example, the opinion that deaths from the influenza virus are 500 or fewer.

The 1918 flu virus killed millions of people because it was so virulent. Subsequent flu strains are less deadly, but they still cause tens of thousands of fatalities annually. The methodology supporting the 500 number is also suspect. If an unidentified virus causes a death that is indistinguishable from the flu virus, how was it determined that it was not the influenza virus?

As was stated, laboratory tests are rarely done, so the statement that "actual flu deaths are incredibly rare" has the whiff of an agenda behind it. According to mainstream literature, variants of the flu virus cause of tens of thousands of fatalities annually. Almost no one accepts the number of 500 oir less.

Anyone can post whatever they like in the Huffington Post, from carefully pre-selected statistics to outright inventions. But if the majority of peer reviewed medical literature concluded that fatalities from the influenza virus was 500 or less annually, that would surely be front page, above the fold news, not something from a blog. In fact, the number of fatalities from the flu is accepted by the vast majority of medical practitioners as being well into the tens of thousands annually.

The influenza virus changes from year to year, and there is always more than one strain extant. Some strains are more deadly than others, but even the least deadly flu causes tens of thousands of fatalities every year in the U.S. alone.

There is no doubt that fatalities caused by the covid-19 virus have not yet peaked. But the number will eventually flatten, and begin to decline. But it is still far less deadly than the average flu virus. Currently, there is a higher probability of a person being killed by a lightning bolt than by the covid-19 virus. At this point it is still questionable whether that will change before this virus has run its course.

No one panics over the possibility of being struck by lightning, and the country isn't shut down due to the flu. Why is there such a panic over this particular virus?

There is more than one answer to that question, but the media is certainly the primary culprit. No one can watch a television program without being reminded in the most hyper terms, over and over again, of the minute-by-minute progress of this virus. Even the smallest detail is repeated constantly, if it shows anything negative. Only the most extreme authorities are interviewed, and without any contrasting opinion. For example, this article would never be broadcast by any of the six TV networks operating in this country.

H.G. Wells The War Of The Worlds is tame compared with the media's fear mongering over this virus. It is surprising that so far there hasn't been any violence. But that is not from lack of effort by the TV and print media. They are doing their utmost to incite violence — and they may well succeed before this media-induced panic runs its course.

Finally, it is always worthwhile to ask: Cui bono? Who benefits?

The media isn't, in effect, throwing gasoline on a fire just to sell more advertising. There is an unstated agenda behind their constant wild-eyed reports, and the panic they create. The media is clearly aware of the recessionary effect shutting down the economy will have in the next six to 8 months, because they constantly remind everyone.

So they're clearly willing to destroy the economy and the savings of millions of people, in order to try and bring down their nemesis. Nothing else has worked, so the media is now ready to sacrifice We The People. Despicable, no?

AdminM said:

The “Spanish Flu” killed an estimated 50-100 million people during a pandemic 1918-19. What if the story we have been told about this pandemic isn’t true? What if, instead, the killer infection was neither the flu nor Spanish in origin? Newly analyzed documents reveal that the “Spanish Flu” may have been a military vaccine experiment gone awry. In looking back on the 100th anniversary of the end of World War I, we need to delve deeper to solve this mystery. During the pandemic of 1918-19, the so-called "Spanish Flu" killed 50-100 million people, including many soldiers. Many people do not realize that disease killed far more soldiers on all sides than machine guns or mustard gas or anything else typically associated with WWI.

In addition to everything this article states about deadly vaccines, I've also read about the causes of the so-called Spanish Flu through my studies of Natural Hygiene over more than 30 years. Natural Hygiene is a system of natural health that believes the body has infinite wisdom and is able to heal itself if only medical intervention gets out of the way. It rejects the germ theory of disease causation and views disease as body initiated healing crises. It also advocates, among other things, cleanliness, sunshine, proper rest, whole foods, fasting to let the body heal itself; plus avoidance of toxic drugs and medications. The view of Natural Hygienists is that the sickly victims were then treated with quinine, which in high doses can be a deadly poison. Could it be that the combination of untested vaccines plus the administration of quinine were the real causes of all the deaths? I've also read that the patients of all the doctors and nurses who followed the guidelines of Natural Hygiene (e.g., sunshine, fresh air, rest, proper nutrition and the avoidance of all drugs), recovered without incident as if they only had contracted seasonal flu. And none of these Natural Hygiene practitioners were ever afflicted with disease themselves. It was medical hubris back then and we're seeing a repeat today.

Last year (2019) Health Impact News reported on the arrest of Paul Petersen by federal agents in Arizona for illegally trafficking children from the Marshall Islands. Paul Petersen was the Maricopa County Assessor and a Mormon adoption attorney who was arrested and indicted in three states for trafficking children through an illegal adoption scheme.  Dillon Rosenblatt of the Arizona Capital Times reports that a prostitution camp in the Marshall Islands, where girls as young as 15 or 16 did sex work in exchange for food and housing, provided many of the birth mothers for the children that were trafficked through adoption to the U.S.

HI Dr.,

First, great presentation; very informative.

My question is - so, if someone gets coronavirus and that person is admitted to a hospital for treatment, does that person have the ability to ask for and receive Ozone Treatment? Does this fall under the new 'right to try' legislation that was recently put into place? I know you alluded to Ozone Treatment being available and so forth but you also talked about its lack of profit potential so just not sure how available it is right now, today, in the United States as far as usage in a hospital setting goes. Could a person go and get Ozone treatment on their own if they wanted to, without going to a hospital?

If you could just clarify that for all, it would be appreciated.

Thanks!!

Fear over the coronavirus is gripping the nation and world, as within a short period of time life around the globe has drastically changed very suddenly. The main question facing everyone in the U.S. today is: How serious is this? Is the response the government is making right now consistent with the threat this virus presents? Some are proposing that anyone in the media who dares to question the official narrative should be silenced for the sake of "public health." Facebook, for example, took strong actions against Health Impact News by claiming we were publishing "fake news," mainly by publishing the views of Dr. Andrew W. Saul, Editor of the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, who published news about successful intravenous Vitamin C therapy which had started in China. And yet this week, the New York Post reported that the same therapy had started at hospitals in New York City. With the Coronavirus situation affecting virtually every single person on the planet right now, suppressing alternative information that goes against the "mainstream" narrative is a very dangerous precedent, and is a clear violation of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment which protects freedom of speech and freedom of the press. It is especially concerning when one of my colleagues in the alternative media, without even contacting me directly, publicly demands that we retract one of our articles authored by a medical doctor, simply because this person believes his view of the current situation is the only correct view. I do not pretend to be an expert on medical science, which is why Health Impact News publishes alternative views by medical doctors and other scientists who are experts in their field. During difficult days like the ones currently facing us, I believe the public has a right to read all sides of the issue and make up their own minds. Caution is certainly prudent, but fear? Among all this fear, where is faith in God? The opposite of fear is "faith." Have we lost our way as a nation? Does the phrase inscribed on our currency "In God we Trust" mean anything anymore? Faith in God does NOT mean we will not face difficult times. On the contrary, often those who are most faithful face the most difficult trials in life. Faith in God means we trust that there is a stronger power than ourselves controlling the affairs of humanity, and that if we trust in him, he will give us the strength to endure whatever trials come our way.

The Bill Melinda Gates Foundation is the largest charitable foundation in the world, with a trust endowment valued at $48 billion and yearly grant payments in excess of $5 billion annually. In addition to being one of the largest contributors to the World Health Organization (WHO), with heavy involvement in global public health, the Gates Foundation is deeply involved in agricultural development. It's a noble cause but one that's being carried out using an agenda that supports agrochemicals, patented seeds and corporate control — interests that undermine regenerative, sustainable, small-scale farming. In a report by Global Justice Now, the excessive global influence held by the Gates Foundation is illustrated, starting with the $2 billion the foundation has spent on agriculture, primarily in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. "It is the world's fifth largest donor to agriculture, spending $389 million in 2013; only Germany, Japan, Norway and the U.S. have larger bilateral aid programs to agriculture," the report noted, and, "With funding comes in influence." Indeed, in February 2012, when the Gates Foundation announced a $200 million donation to the International Fund for Agricultural Development, Gates talked of the importance of brining "agricultural science and technology to poor farmers." These are buzzwords that imply genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and biotechnology, which are heavily favored by the Gates Foundation.

Coconut oil, whose health benefits have been proven in the past, will be tested for use as a potential treatment for the novel coronavirus infection. “That [VCO] is being looked into,” Philippine Health Secretary Francisco Duque III told CNN Philippines’ Newsroom on Tuesday. “We have heard very good studies with regard to its ability to neutralize the viruses, but for the COVID- 19, it is not clear,” the top health official added. He made the reaction following Cabinet Secretary Karlo Nograles' announcement Monday that a former academician from one of the country’s top universities proposed to test coconut oil as COVID-19 treatment amid the absence of a specific treatment. In a research proposal published on January 31, Ateneo de Manila University Professor Emeritus Fabian Antonio Dayrit and Dr. Mary Newport of Spring Hill Neonatolody in Florida, United States proposed to conduct a clinical study on patients infected with the COVID-19 involving VCO, saying “this treatment is affordable and virtually risk-free, and the potential benefits are enormous.” Nograles said the National University of Singapore has agreed to test VCO as a prophylactic against the COVID-19. Current evidence suggests coconut oil and its derivatives are safe and effective antiviral compounds in both humans and animals, the researchers noted. “Several in vitro, animal, and human studies support the potential of coconut oil, lauric acid and its derivatives as effective and safe agents against a virus like nCoV-2019 [COVID-19],” they said.

Dr. Paul Saladino trained at the University of Arizona with a focus on integrative medicine. He completed his residency in psychiatry at the University of Washington in 2019, and is a certified functional medicine practitioner through the Institute for Functional Medicine. In this interview, Saladino discusses the surprising benefits of the carnivore diet, which is the topic of his new book, “The Carnivore Code,” which is currently available for preorder. I view him as one of the leading experts on the health benefits of an animal-based diet. Saladino takes it to the extreme, though, advocating a carnivore diet to the exclusion of all vegetables or plant materials, which may strike many as debatable. The evidence he presents for it, however, is quite compelling. I don't know anyone personally who has reviewed the literature more carefully and can put together a coherent argument for this strategy. (This is in part a side-effect of having gone through the basic medical sciences twice, as he went through medical school to be a physician’s assistant and later an M.D.) Saladino is likely to challenge your beliefs in this interview. This is not meant to offend anyone. If you believe you should avoid animal foods for ethical reasons, that’s certainly your choice. If you’re struggling with health issues that a vegetarian diet has not been able to resolve, however, or perhaps even made your condition worse, you may want to listen to what he has to say.